Confrontation Rule: Revision history

10 June 2025

• curprev 20:5020:50, 10 June 2025 Admin talk contribs m 11,563 bytes 0 Text replacement - "REf>" to "ref>"

13 August 2024

• curprev 19:5219:52, 13 August 2024 Admin talk contribs 11,563 bytes +31 No edit summary

10 May 2024

• curprev 09:5909:59, 10 May 2024 Admin talk contribs 11,532 bytes +207 →General Principles
• curprev 09:5509:55, 10 May 2024 Admin talk contribs 11,325 bytes +89 →General Principles
• curprev 09:5409:54, 10 May 2024 Admin talk contribs 11,236 bytes +279 →Remedy
• curprev 09:5209:52, 10 May 2024 Admin talk contribs 10,957 bytes +330 →General Principles
• curprev 09:4309:43, 10 May 2024 Admin talk contribs 10,627 bytes +1 →General Principles
• curprev 09:4209:42, 10 May 2024 Admin talk contribs 10,626 bytes +10,626 Created page with "==General Principles== {{seealso|Cross-Examination}} The confrontation rule, also known as the rule in ''Brown v Dunn'', states that where a party is advancing a theory that contradicts the testimony of a particular witness being questioned, the counter-version must be put to the witness.<ref> {{CanLIIRx|Sawatzky|h4bfm|2017 ABCA 179 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtABCA}}{{atsL|h4bfm|23| to 26}}<br> {{CanLIIRP|Dyck|gb5n1|1969 CanLII 988 (BC CA)|[1970] 2 CCC 283 (BCCA)}}{{perBCCA|Robe..."