Crown Letter re Admissions (Precedent): Difference between revisions
Appearance
m Text replacement - "| style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |" to "| style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |-->" |
m Admin moved page Precedent - Crown Letter re Admissions to Crown Letter re Admissions (Precedent) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Letter== | ==Letter== | ||
{|class="wikitable" style="width:650px; background-color:white; " | <!--{|class="wikitable" style="width:650px; background-color:white; " | ||
! Letter/email to defence counsel | ! Letter/email to defence counsel | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 22:51, 23 December 2024
All forms, templates and precedents, including anything found on this page, can be used without the need for any attribution. |
Letter
With a view to streamlining the case pursuant to the Crown's Jordan duties, I’m proposing the following defence admissions:
- ☐ The following records as business records within the meaning of s. 30 of the Evidence Act:
- Record #1 ...
- ☐ The Mohan requirements necessary to qualify the expert as identified in the notice dated [date] have been made out
- ☐ The authenticity and reliability of the following electronic records captured by s. 31.1 of the Evidence Act:
- Record #1...
- ☐ The authenticity and continuity of the following items seized as listed in the exhibit sheet (attached) that constitute real evidence:
- item #1...
- ☐ The authenticity and reliability of the following videos and/or photographs:
- image #1...
- video #1...
- The voluntariness of the utterances given by the accused to a person in authority on [date] when [circumstances]
- The voluntariness of the audio/video recorded cautioned statement given by the accused to a person in authority on [date] when [circumstances]
Please advise whether you are prepared to agree to any of the above admissions. |}
<gdoc id="1w0YW_hiammGqi3x_ksinjpVxQFNUfQd-vzXr1SHj-Tg" width="750" height="1000" />